Make every visit feel personal.

Not the way most tools do it. They hide your page while the test loads, then show it again once they are ready, which is where the delay and the flash both come from. Intempt picks the variant on the server before the page draws, so there is nothing to hide and nothing to wait for.

No. The crawler and the visitor get the same response, because the variant is chosen before the page is built rather than swapped in after it loads.

Enough that the result means something. Two things lower the bar: using what you already knew about a person before the test started, and stopping early when the answer is clear instead of waiting out a fixed window. Neither removes the floor. If you get a handful of conversions a week, a test will take months, and the software will say so instead of showing you a winner.

Both, and it is one product. Web pages use the visual editor. Your app asks the SDK what to show and draws it, the same way your backend would. There is no second licence and no second audience to build.

You promote it and the branch goes away. A flag, a test and a permanent rule are the same object, so a finished rollout turns into a rule. In a standalone flagging tool the flag outlives the rollout and cleaning it up becomes somebody's job.

Two reasons people give. A separate flagging tool knows your code and has never seen your customer data, so it cannot target on plan, lifecycle stage, or what someone did on your site an hour ago. And the bill: flag platforms charge per seat and per connection, and teams end up sharing logins to keep it down.

Not for a page change. For your app or your backend, a developer installs the SDK once and reads values by name after that. Deciding who sees what stays with you.